The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte YIMING HUAI
____________
Appeal No. 2002-1212
Application No. 09/349,745
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, JEFFREY T. SMITH and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicant appeals the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims 1
to 10, 12 to 17 and 19 to 23, all of the pending claims.1, 2 We have jurisdiction under 35
U.S.C. § 134.
1 In rendering our decision, we have considered Appellant’s arguments presented in the Brief,
filed August 6, 2001 and the Reply Brief, filed January 24, 2002.
2 The Appellant has indicated that claims 11 and 18 have been cancelled. (Brief, p. 2).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007