Ex Parte HUAI - Page 7

             Appeal No. 2002-1212                                                                                     
             Application No. 09/349,745                                                                               


                                                  CONCLUSION                                                          
                    For the above reasons, and those stated in the Briefs, we conclude that the                       
             Examiner has not carried the burden of establishing a prima facie case of obviousness of                 
             the invention recited in any of the Appellant’s claims.  Consequently, we reverse the                    
             Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejections.                                                                   


                                                    REVERSED                                                          


                                                                            )                                         
                                                                            )                                         
                                  EDWARD C. KIMLIN                          )                                         
                                  Administrative Patent Judge               )                                         
                                                                            )                                         
                                                                            )                                         
                                                                            ) BOARD OF PATENT                         
                                  JEFFREY T. SMITH                          )        APPEALS                          
                                  Administrative Patent Judge               )            AND                          
                                                                            )  INTERFERENCES                          
                                                                            )                                         
                                                                            )                                         
                                  JAMES T. MOORE                            )                                         
                                  Administrative Patent Judge               )                                         



             JTS/kis                                                                                                  

                                                          7                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007