Ex Parte NAGGI et al - Page 2




             Appeal No. 2002-1356                                                                                 
             Application No. 09/206,063                                                                           
                    11.  A method of preparing a stabilized osmotic agent comprising the following                
             steps:                                                                                               
                    providing a solution of starch dissolved in water;                                            
                    providing a solution of NaOCl; and                                                            
                    adding the NaOCl solution to the starch solution to oxidize the starch.                       
                    17.    A method of preparing a stabilized osmotic agent comprising the following              
             step:                                                                                                
                    dissolving starch in an acid and an alcohol selected from the group consisting of             
             methanol, butanol and glycerol.                                                                      
                    The prior art references relied upon by the examiner are:                                     
             Horn et al. (Horn)               3,974,034                  Aug. 10, 1976                            
             Eliasson, ed. (Eliasson), Carbohydrates in Food, Chapter 4: “Cell Wall Polysaccharide:               
             Structural, Chemical and Analytical Aspects,” Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York,  pp. 191,               
             195 (1996)                                                                                           
             Solomons, Organic Chemistry, 2nd ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York,  p. 890 (1976)                  

             Grounds of Rejection                                                                                 
                    Claims 5-22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Solomons                  
             in view of Eliasson and Horn.                                                                        
                    We affirm the rejection as it applies to claims 5-16 and reverse the rejection as it          
             applies to claims 17-22.                                                                             


             Claim Grouping                                                                                       
                    The separate patentability of each of the independent claims is argued separate               
             and apart from each other.   Brief, page 7.  Dependent claims are not separately argued              
             in the Brief.  Therefore, we treat claim 5 as representative of claims 5-10, claim 11 as             
             representative of claims 11-16, and claim 17 as representative of claims 17-22.                      

                                                        2                                                         



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007