Appeal No. 2002-1360 Page 2 Application No. 09/133,942 The examiner relies on the following references: Craig et al. (Craig) 4,703,018 Oct. 27, 1987 Maehara et al. (Maehara), “Immunochemical Determination of the Serum Protein Reacting with Antibody against Human Urinary Trypsin Inhibitor by Single Radial Immunodiffusion: Use of Polyethylene Glycol,” Journal of Immunological Methods, Vol. 80, pp. 117-123 (1985) Claims 1-8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Maehara. Claims 1-10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious in view of Craig and Maehara. We reverse. Background The specification discloses a “method for measuring the concentration or activity of urinary trypsin inhibitor (UTI) contained in body fluids. The presence of UTI was initially recognized in urine but its presence has been confirmed in body fluids other than urine by subsequent studies.” Page 1. “[I]t has been reported that the amount of UTI present in urine significantly increases in patients with bacterial infections, malignant tumors . . ., renal diseases or myocardial infarction, or patients having undergone surgical operations, pregnancy, or the like.” Id. Conventional methods of detecting UTI immunologically “include single radial immunodiffusion (SRID), radioimmunoassay (RIA), enzyme immunoassay (EIA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), latex agglutinationPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007