Ex Parte CATOE et al - Page 2




           Appeal No. 2002-1633                                                                      
           Application 09/281,093                                                                    


           (specification, page 1).  Representative claim 1 reads as                                 
           follows:                                                                                  
                 1. A collating apparatus for collecting sample chips,                               
           comprising:                                                                               
                 a framework supporting a plurality of supply bins housing                           
           sample chips and a track running adjacent the plurality of supply                         
           bins;                                                                                     
                 at least one collection bin shaped and dimensioned for                              
           movement on the track; and                                                                
                 at least one gantry for transferring sample chips from the                          
           plurality of supply bins to the at least one collection bin when                          
           the at least one collection bin is aligned with respective supply                         
           bins.                                                                                     
                                          THE REJECTIONS                                             
                 Claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 14, 16 and 17 stand rejected under                         
           35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent No.                                
           4,824,306 to Stevenson.                                                                   
                 Claims 3, 4, 7, 10 through 13, 15, 18 and 19 stand rejected                         
           under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Stevenson.                            
                 Attention is directed to the appellants’ main and reply                             
           briefs (Paper Nos. 15 and 17) and to the examiner’s final                                 
           rejection and answer (Paper Nos. 8 and 16) for the respective                             
           positions of the appellants and the examiner with regard to the                           
           merits of these rejections.                                                               






                                                  2                                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007