Ex Parte CATOE et al - Page 9




           Appeal No. 2002-1633                                                                      
           Application 09/281,093                                                                    


                 In light of the foregoing, we shall not sustain the standing                        
           35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claims 7, 10 through 13, 15, 18                           
           and 19 as being unpatentable over Stevenson.                                              
                                             SUMMARY                                                 
                 The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 through 19                          
           is affirmed with respect to claims 1 through 5 and reversed with                          
           respect to claims 6 through 19.                                                           


























                                                  9                                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007