The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 35 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte HENDRICUS M.J.C. VAN KURINGEN ____________ Appeal No. 2002-1885 Application No. 08/966,453 ____________ HEARD: MARCH 20, 2003 ____________ Before BARRETT, GROSS, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-91, which are all of the claims pending in this application. BACKGROUND Appellant’s invention relates to a controller for a printing unit. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced as follows: 1 The rejection of claims 1-9 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, has been withdrawn by the examiner (answer, page 2).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007