Appeal No. 2002-1885 Page 3 Application No. 08/966,453 The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Suzuki 4,722,064 Jan. 26, 1988 Appellant’s Admitted Prior Art (of Figure 2) Claims 1-9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Suzuki in view of the admitted prior art of figure 2. Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and appellant regarding the above-noted rejection, we make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper No. 29, mailed October 2, 2001) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejection, and to appellant's brief (Paper No. 28, filed June 19, 2001) for appellant's arguments thereagainst. Only those arguments actually made by appellant have been considered in this decision. Arguments which appellant could have made but chose not to make in the brief have not been considered. See 37 CFR 1.192(a). OPINION In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have carefully considered the subject matter on appeal, the rejection advancedPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007