The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 29 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte YIMING ZHOU, MARK JOHN MCGRATH and VINCENT CARL HARRADINE ____________ Appeal No. 2002-1960 Application No. 08/821,3211 ____________ HEARD: APRIL 15, 2003 ____________ Before KRASS, RUGGIERO, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-10, which are all of the claims pending in this application. We reverse. BACKGROUND Appellants’ invention relates to an editing system for associating text with a video sequence by taking into 1 Application for patent filed March 20, 1997, which claims the foreign filing priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of British Application No. 9606443.1, filed March 27, 1996.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007