The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte REMY F. GROSS, II,
JOHN P. DELMORE,
and
WALTER E. BUSKE1
__________
Appeal No. 2002-2029
Application No. 09/440,037
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before KRATZ, DELMENDO, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
(2002) from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through
14 and 20 through 23 (final Office action mailed May 22, 2001,
1 The appellants submitted a request under 37 CFR § 1.48(b)
(1997) to delete the third-named inventor, together with a
request to cancel non-elected claims 15-19. (Reply filed Oct.
23, 2000, paper 6.) We note, however, that the examiner has not
commented on the appellants’ requests. Upon receipt of this
application, the examiner should treat the appellants’ requests
as may be appropriate under the circumstances.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007