Ex Parte MIHALISIN et al - Page 9




               Appeal No. 2002-2142                                                                       Page 9                
               Application No. 09/276,858                                                                                       

                      With respect to claims 9-11, Appellants argue that Wukusick is silent with respect to                     
               controlling carbon content in the manner required by claim 9.  Claim 9 recites “providing said                   
               nickel base superalloy with a C concentration controlled in accordance with the equation, % area                 
               fraction scale = -0.193 x carbon content in ppm + 86 effective to substantially reduce formation                 
               of said as-cast metallic scale when the superalloy is solidified as a single crystal casting.”  Again,           
               “[a] person of ordinary skill in the art does not need to recognize that a method or structure                   
               behaves according to a law of nature in order to fully and effectively practice the method or                    
               structure.”  EMI Group North America, 268 F.3d at 1351, 60 USPQ2d at 1429-30.  The equation                      
               recited in the claim represents what happens to the % area fraction scale in accordance with the                 
               laws of nature as the carbon concentration varies.  This law of nature is followed whether or not                
               one practicing the process of providing carbon in a nickel base superalloy knows it or not.                      
               Wukusick provides carbon in an amount effective to substantially reduce formation of as-cast                     
               metallic scale as required by the claim.  The carbon concentration is necessarily controlled in                  
               accordance with the equation.1                                                                                   
                      We find that claims 1-4, 9-11, 17, and 18 are anticipated by Wukusick because there is                    
               reason to believe that the reduced scale and grain recrystallization properties required by the                  
               claims would be obtained when practicing the preferred and most preferred embodiments of                         

                      1Should prosecution continue, the Examiner should consider whether claim 9 is sufficiently definite in    
               accordance with 35 U.S.C. 112, ¶ 2. The scope of carbon concentrations encompassed is somewhat unclear as the    
               equation is only valid for carbon concentrations between 0 and 450 ppm (see Fig. 2), but the language “effective to
               substantially reduce formation of said as-cast metallic scale” relates to concentrations of about 0.04 wt. % (400 ppm)
               and above, including concentrations above 450 ppm (specification at 10, ll. 19-23).  It is thus not entirely clear what
               concentrations are encompassed by the claim.                                                                     







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007