Appeal No. 2002-2142 Page 12 Application No. 09/276,858 the claims and further indicates that an increased concentration of carbon is desirable provides the required basis to conclude that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to formulate alloys of composition within the claimed ranges for production of single crystal castings therefrom. This is not to say that Appellants’ claims are unpatentable, rather, the existence of overlapping or encompassing ranges shifts the burden to the applicants to show that their invention would not have been obvious. Peterson, 315 F.3d at 1329, 65 USPQ2d at 1383. Appellants do not state that they are relying upon any objective evidence for a showing of unexpected results or other secondary considerations which would be sufficient to meet this burden. We conclude that the Examiner has established a prima facie case of obviousness with respect to the subject matter of claims 1-20 which has not been sufficiently rebutted by Appellants. OTHER ISSUES Should prosecution continue, the Examiner may wish to review U.S. Patent 5,549,765 issued to Mihalisin et al. See, in particular, column 3, lines 9-20 which describes a range of alloy compositions fully encompassing those of claims such as claim 5. See also Tables 3, 4 and Table 11, CMSX-4 for species of alloys fully within the ranges of various claims or closely adjacent thereto. This patent is of record (PTO-892 of Paper no. 5).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007