Ex Parte CLARK - Page 7




              Appeal No. 2002-2254                                                                  Page 7                 
              Application No. 09/456,046                                                                                   


                     Second, the claimed front drip edge, rear drip edge, left grease barrier and right                    
              grease barrier forming an open upper volume where grease drippings and splatter may                          
              accumulate and eventually be discarded is readable on the retaining wall 15 of Sandaj.                       
              As shown from the perspective of Figure 1, the retaining wall 15 has a front drip edge                       
              portion, a rear drip edge portion, a left grease barrier portion and a right grease barrier                  
              portion which together form an open upper volume where grease drippings and splatter                         
              may accumulate and eventually be discarded.                                                                  


                     Lastly, the claimed left grease barrier and right grease barrier being of  semi-                      
              hemispherical cross-section to allow the wheels of the grill to easily roll over is readable                 
              on the curved retaining wall 15 of Sandaj.  As shown best in Figures 3 and 4, the                            
              curved retaining wall 15 has a semi-hemispherical cross-section that would permit the                        
              wheels of the grill 12 to easily roll over.                                                                  


                     For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1                      
              and 3 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) is affirmed.                                                                  


                     The appellants have grouped claims 1, 3 and 4 as standing or falling together.2                       
              Thereby, in accordance with 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7), claim 4 falls with claims 1 and 3.                         

                     2 See page 4 of the appellant's brief.                                                                







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007