The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAKE W. PIVAROFF
____________
Appeal No. 2002-2305
Application No. 09/473,792
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15 and 17, the only claims
remaining in this application. Claims 2 through 8, 12, 14, 16
and 18 have been canceled.
As noted on page 1 of the specification, appellant's
invention relates to a deep muscle stimulation device which uses
percussion and mechanical vibrations that reach deep into the
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007