Appeal No. 2002-2305 Application No. 09/473,792 a cam element having a finger held therein held in the hollow top housing; the cam element coupled to the electric motor to translate rotary motion of a shaft of the electric motor to reciprocating motion of a titanium hollow head; the titanium hollow head being attached to a linkage means coupled to the finger to allow reciprocation of the hollow head a predetermined amount, in a rapid manner, determined by the speed of the electrical motor; the titanium hollow head having a hollow inner chamber with granular material held therein and filing between 1/4 and ½ of the volume of the hollow inner chamber; and the hollow inner chamber having approximately 10 grains of granular diamonds, 25 grains of granular rubies, 200 grains of granular copper and 100 grains of carbon therein. 9. The deep muscle stimulation device of claim 1 wherein the hollow head is comprised of a titanium hollow body and a titanium cap secured to the hollow body, and the titanium cap is secured to the linkage means. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claim are: Priest 1,787,211 Dec. 30, 1930 Kamazawa 4,827,914 May 9, 1989 Claims 1, 11, 13, 15 and 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Kamazawa. 33Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007