Ex Parte NAGAOKA - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-0037                                                        
          Application 09/924,681                                                      


          examiner entered an answer (Paper No. 23), noted a reply brief              
          (Paper No. 24) filed by the appellant and forwarded the                     
          application to this Board for review of the new rejections.                 
                                   THE INVENTION                                      
               The invention relates to “an input pen for use in a pressure           
          sensitive handwriting input unit” (specification, page 1).                  
          Representative claim 1 reads as follows:                                    
               1. An input pen for use in a pressure sensitive handwriting            
          input unit, comprising:                                                     
               a pen cylinder having a front end and a read [sic, rear]1              
          end;                                                                        
               a front input member disposed on said front end of said pen            
          cylinder and having an input portion used for input operations,             
          said front input member being made of a synthetic resin; and                
               a rear input member disposed on said rear end of said pen              
          cylinder and having an input portion used for input operations,             
          said rear input member being made of an elastic material softer             
          than said synthetic resin.                                                  
                                   THE PRIOR ART                                      
               The references relied on by the examiner to support the                
          rejections on appeal are:                                                   
          Verrier et al. (Verrier)             5,475,401     Dec. 12, 1995            
          Takahashi et al. (Takahashi)         5,638,093     Jun. 10, 1997            
          Yoshimura                            5,850,059     Dec. 15, 1998            





               1 The above noted informality in claim 1 is deserving of               
          correction upon return of the application to the technology                 
          center.                                                                     
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007