The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte PATRICK W. TANDY _____________ Appeal No. 2003-0175 Application No. 09/769,976 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before LIEBERMAN, MOORE and POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judges. POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 31-36, which are all of the claims pending in the application. Claim 31 is representative of the subject matter on appeal and is reproduced below: 31. A packaged integrated circuit device comprising:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007