Appeal No. 2003-0371 Page 11
Application No. 09/465,941
The rejection of claim 2 as being unpatentable over Woods in view of Carlson is
not sustained.
The rejection of claims 5-8 as being unpatentable over Woods in view of
Tenebaum is not sustained.
The rejection of claims 12, 13 and 17 as being unpatentable over Woods in view
of Peeler is not sustained.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal
may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007