Appeal No. 2003-0405 Page 14 Application No. 09/635,183 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Kidston is affirmed; and the decision of the examiner to reject claims 2 and 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Cikanek is reversed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED-IN-PART NEAL E. ABRAMS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JOHN P. McQUADE ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JEFFREY V. NASE ) Administrative Patent Judge )Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007