Ex Parte INGRAM et al - Page 1


                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                    
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                            
                                                                                         Paper No.  15                    
                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                      __________                                                          
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                            
                                                      __________                                                          
                                Ex parte EDWARD L. INGRAM and MARY E. SCOTT                                               
                                                      __________                                                          
                                                Appeal No. 2003-0443                                                      
                                              Application No. 09/465,653                                                  
                                                      __________                                                          
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                           
                                                      __________                                                          
                 Before WINTERS, ADAMS and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
                 ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                      
                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                         This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                                  
                 examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-7, which are all the claims pending in the                        
                 application.                                                                                             
                         Claim 3 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and is reproduced                        
                 below:                                                                                                   
                         3. A composition which consists essentially of a combination of:                                 
                                c.  Alchohol [sic];                                                                       
                                d.  Turpentine; and                                                                       
                                e.  Eucalyptus Oil;                                                                       
                            and wherein said combination comprises an amount of alcohol from                              
                            about 25 percent to 40 percent by volume.[1]                                                  

                                                                                                                          
                 1 It is unclear on this record why the lettered bullets in this claim start at letter “c” and not - - a - -.
                 For the purposes of this appeal we assume that a typographical error was made and the bullets            
                 should be lettered - - a–c - - and not “c-e”.  We encourage the examiner to clarify this issue prior     
                 to any further action on the merits.                                                                     




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007