Ex Parte Brownfield - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-0524                                                          
          Application No. 09/593,816                                                    


          (Fed. Cir. 1986); In re Sernaker, 702 F.2d 989, 991, 217 USPQ 1, 3            
          (Fed. Cir. 1983).  Claims 1 and 5 are illustrative of the subject             
          matter on appeal and read as follows:                                         
               1.  A carrier member for seating a device having a plurality of          
          solder terminal[s], the carrier member comprising:                            
               a substrate having a plurality of landing pads thereon; and              
                                                                                       
               a plurality of leads on the substrate which are in electrical            
          communication with the landing pads on the substrate; wherein at              
          least one of the plurality of landing pads has a depression therein           
          adapted for seating at least one of the solder terminals on the               
          device.                                                                       
               5.  The carrier member of claim 1, wherein the plurality of              
          landing pads comprise eutectic solder.                                        


                                      The References                                    
               In rejecting the claims under 35 U.S.C. ' 103(a), the examiner           
          relies upon the following references:                                         
          Glenn et al. (Glenn)           6,228,676 B1 May  08, 2001                     
          (filed Jul. 07, 1999)                                                         
          Saitoh                       6,291,775 B1 Sep. 18, 2001                     
          (filed Apr. 14, 1999)                                                         
          Applicant=s Admitted Prior Art, figure 1, pages 1 and 2 (AAPA)                


                                      The Rejections                                    
               Claims 1-4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. '103(a) as being               
          unpatentable over Saitoh in view of AAPA.                                     



                                         2                                              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007