Appeal No. 2003-0550
Application No. 09/580,411
appellant's die cutter apparatus from the die cutter apparatus of
Carll.
Since we find that the examiner has treated all of the
limitations of claim 1 and agree with the examiner that the
connection in Carll can serve as a "lost motion connection" and
actually does so during set-up of the die units therein, we will
sustain the examiner's rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(b) as being anticipated by Carll.
The decision of the examiner, accordingly, is affirmed.
99
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007