Ex Parte Conboy et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-0614                                                        
          Application 09/520,591                                                      


               means for determining an incoming angle of rotation on a               
          wafer at a first stage of wafer processing;                                 
               means for rotating the wafer to an outgoing angle of                   
          rotation before moving into a second stage of wafer processing;             
          and                                                                         
               a computer arrangement that records the angle of rotation              
          and a corresponding wafer location in the wafer processing system           
          as the wafer moves through each stage of the processing system.             
                                   THE PRIOR ART                                      
               The references relied on by the examiner to support the                
          final rejection are:                                                        
          Bacchi et al. (Bacchi)           5,511,934         Apr. 30, 1996            
          Tigelaar et al. (Tigelaar)       6,180,424         Jan. 30, 2001            
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 1 through 26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,              
          first paragraph, as being based on a specification which fails to           
          comply with the enablement requirement.                                     
               Claims 1, 3, 16, 19 and 21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
          § 102(e) as being anticipated by Tigelaar.                                  
               Claim 18 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being             
          unpatentable over Tigelaar.                                                 
               Claims 2, 4 through 15, 17, 20 and 22 through 26 stand                 
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over                
          Tigelaar in view of Bacchi.                                                 
               Attention is directed to the appellants’ main and reply                
          briefs (Paper Nos. 8 and 12) and to the final rejection and                 

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007