Ex Parte Bohling et al - Page 2


         Appeal No. 2003-0715                                                       
         Application No. 09/873,806                                                 

         pending claim, remains withdrawn from further consideration                
         pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.142(b) (1959).1                                     
              The subject matter on appeal relates to a process for                 
         cleaning weak acid cation exchange resins.  Regarding their                
         invention, the appellants allege (specification, page 4, lines             
         9-12): “We have found that selected steam treatment at a                   
         specified point in the processing of the weak acid cation                  
         exchange resin is critical to providing a final weak acid cation           
         exchange resin useful as a component in potable water treatment            
         systems...”  Further details of this appealed subject matter are           
         recited in representative claims 1 and 7 reproduced below:                 
                   1.  A process for cleaning weak acid cation                      
              exchange resins comprising:                                           
                   (a) converting a weak acid cation exchange                       
                        resin, substantially in neutralized salt                    
                        form, to a hydrogen-form weak acid cation                   
                        exchange resin by regenerating with an acid                 
                        regenerant; and                                             
                   (b) contacting the hydrogen-form weak acid                       
                        cation exchange resin with 1 to 15 kilograms                
                        of steam per kilogram of hydrogen-form weak                 
                        acid cation exchange resin at a resin bed                   
                        temperature of 100 to 180°C for a period of                 
                        at least one hour.                                          
                   7.  The process of claim 1 further comprising                    
              contacting the hydrogen-form weak acid cation exchange                
                                                                                   
              1  The appellants’ statement in the appeal brief (filed Aug.          
         5, 2002, paper 13, p. 1) regarding the status of claims is                 
         erroneous.                                                                 


                                         2                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007