Ex Parte Bohling et al - Page 4


         Appeal No. 2003-0715                                                       
         Application No. 09/873,806                                                 

                       Claims 1-6, 9, and 10: Ballard & Nagai                       
              Ballard describes a process for activating and cleaning a             
         weak acid cation exchange resin beads comprising:                          
              (a) hydrolyzing the resin beads; and                                  
              (b) cleaning the beads by: (i) washing including treatment            
                   with an alcohol; (ii) steam stripping; or (iii) steam            
                   stripping porogens from the beads and then washing               
                   them to remove any free solid particulate material.              
         (Column 1, lines 7-18; column 6, lines 12-39.)  In Example 2,              
         Ballard teaches converting a neutralized salt form of the resin            
         (beads containing sodium acrylate functional groups) to the                
         hydrogen-form with hydrochloric acid, which is described in the            
         present specification as an “acid regenerant.”  (Specification,            
         page 5, line 27 to page 7, line 16.)                                       
              Similarly, Nagai describes a process for cleaning and                 
         treating weak acid cation exchange resins comprising:                      
              (a) cleaning the beads with hot water to remove suspension            
                   stabilizer, unreacted monomer, and pore forming agent;           
                   and                                                              



                                                                                   
                                                                                   
         Accordingly, for the first ground of rejection, we confine our             
         discussion to claim 1; for the second ground of rejection, we              
         confine our discussion to claim 7.  37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7)(1995).            

                                         4                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007