Appeal No. 2003-1081 Application 08/581,347 out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the appellant regards as the invention. The appellant’s claims all require “substantially” uniform heat transfer across the substrate. When a word of degree such as “substantially” is used in a claim, the specification must provide some standard for measuring that degree such that one of ordinary skill in the art would understand what is claimed when the claim is read in light of the specification. See Seattle Box Co. v. Industrial Crating & Packing, Inc., 731 F.2d 818, 826, 221 USPQ 568, 573-74 (Fed. Cir. 1984). The appellant’s specification indicates that the heat transfer across the substrate is substantially uniform when the appellant’s heat transferring seal (220) is used and the thermal conductivity of this seal “closely” matches that of the heat transfer gas in the region enclosed by the seal (page 9, lines 1- 8). The specification, however, does not provide a standard for measuring the degree encompassed by “closely”. The only seal material and heat transfer gas disclosed in the specification are, respectively, Kapton® and helium (page 7, lines 23-26; page 10, lines 1-10). The DuPont website indicates that the 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007