Appeal No. 2003-1081 Application 08/581,347 appropriate combinations of seal materials and heat transfer gases can be chosen to provide substantially uniform heat transfer. This portion of the specification discloses that heat transfer functions for the seal and the heat transferring gas can be defined and equated to “determine the ratio or the relation between the thermal conductivity of the gas and the thermal conductivity of the seal such that the heat transfer between the lower electrode and the substrate is substantially uniform across the substrate” (page 9, lines 24-27), but does not provide a standard for determining the scope of “substantially”. The discussion in the appellant’s specification regarding the prior art and the appellant’s figure 4b further indicates that the scope of “substantially uniform” is unclear with respect to the heat transfer across the substrate. The discussion of the prior art indicates that the periphery of the substrate, which touches the cooled lower electrode as shown in the appellant’s figure 1, is cooler than the central portion of the substrate which, due to bowing of the substrate by the heat transferring gas, is farther away than the periphery of the substrate from the lower electrode (page 1, lines 19-21; page 3, lines 1-8). The appellant’s figure 4b and the discussion thereof (page 11, lines 21-24) indicate that the periphery of the appellant’s 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007