Ex Parte MORADI - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-1249                                                        
          Application 09/386,972                                                      

                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellants claim a field emission device and a method              
          for making it.  Claims 4 and 17 are illustrative:                           
               4.   A method of manufacturing a field emission device, the            
          method comprising:                                                          
               operating the field emission device in a pressure of at most           
          about 10-8 Torr for at least approximately 15 minutes to remove             
          at least a portion of materials from within said field emission             
          device; and                                                                 
               sealing the field emission device;                                     
               17. A field emission device formed by a method comprising:             
               operating the field emission device in a pressure of at most           
          about 10-8 Torr for at least approximately 15 minutes to remove a           
          least a portion of outgassed materials through a tube before                
          pinching off the tube to seal the field emission device.                    
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Itoh et al. (Itoh)               5,564,958         Oct. 15, 1996            
          Watkins et al. (Watkins)         5,827,102         Oct. 27, 1998            
          Konuma                           6,042,441         Mar. 28, 2000            
          (filed Apr.  2, 1998)                                                       
                                    THE REJECTION                                     
               Claims 2, 4-7, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23                  
          and 25-33 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                     
          unpatentable over Konuma in view of Itoh and Watkins.                       




                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007