The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RODNEY RUESCH
____________
Appeal No. 2003-1262
Application No. 09/620,6791
____________
HEARD: NOVEMBER 6, 2003
____________
Before KRASS, DIXON and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final
rejection of claims 7-10, 15, 16 and 23-25. Claims 1-6 and 17-22
have been withdrawn from consideration as being drawn to a non-
elected invention. The Examiner has objected to claims 11-14 and
has indicated their allowability if rewritten in independent form
including all of the limitations of the base claim and any
intervening claims.
We reverse.
1 Application for patent filed July 20, 2000.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007