Appeal No. 2003-1374 Application No. 09/591,947 agree with the appellants that Hayes and Prescott are from nonanalogous art. In view of the foregoing, we determine that the prior art references as a whole would have rendered the claimed subject matter obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art. Hence, we affirm the examiner’s decision rejection claims 13, 15 and 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED CHUNG K. PAK ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT THOMAS A. WALTZ ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ROMULO H. DELMENDO ) Administrative Patent Judge ) CKP/lp 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007