Ex Parte Gupta et al - Page 1




         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not         
         written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         
                                                           Paper No. 9              

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                    __________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                 
                                    __________                                      
                                Ex parte VINEET GUPTA,                              
                                BRIAN ALAN COTTERMAN,                               
                                         and                                        
                                    SAMEER GUPTA                                    
                                    __________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2003-1447                                
                             Application No. 09/689,720                             
                                    ___________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                      
                                    ___________                                     

         Before GARRIS, WARREN and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.             
         MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                
              This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final                
         rejection of claims 1-4, 7-14, and 17-21.  Claims 5-6 and 15-16            
         have been canceled. [check this]  Thus, only claims 1-4, 7-14, and         
         17-21 are before us on this appeal.                                        
                                 REPRESENTATIVE CLAIM                               
              The appellants have indicated (Brief, page 4) that they are           
         agreeable to the examiner’s grouping the claims together by                








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007