Appeal No. 2003-1447 Application No. 09/689,720 II. The Rejection of Claims 8 and 17 under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) as being unpatentable over Takagi. The examiner has found that Takagai discloses all of the limitations of the claimed invention, except for a rib element that is molded directly into the faceplate. (Examiner’s Answer, page 6, lines 11-12). The examiner concludes that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to use a rib element molded directly into the faceplate in order to prevent shock and make a low cost for manufacturing. As this rejection relies in part on the rejection we have previously reversed, we reverse this rejection for the reasons enumerated above. 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007