Appeal No. 2003-1513
Application No. 09/326,412
Summary
In summary, we reverse the examiner’s rejection under 35
U.S.C. § 112, ¶1, of appealed claim 22 as lacking written
description. We affirm, however, the rejection under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) of appealed claims 19, 20, and 22 as unpatentable over
Boyd in view of Baker.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
Terry J. Owens )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
Romulo H. Delmendo )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
Linda R. Poteate )
Administrative Patent Judge )
RHD/kis
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007