Ex Parte PRALL - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-1556                                                        
          Application 09/288,932                                                      


          semiconductor device having a sublithographic buried contact.               
          Claim 1 is illustrative:                                                    
               1.   A semiconductor structure for formation of a                      
          semiconductor device having a sublithographic buried contact                
          therein, the assembly comprising:                                           
               a plurality of transistor gate structures and word lines               
          adjacent a buried contact area on a substrate, the word lines               
          lying in substantially parallel relation to one another and                 
          defining a first gap between word lines peripheral to the buried            
          contact and a second gap between word lines atop the buried                 
          contact, which second gap is wider than the first gap;                      
               an insulator layer deposited over and adjacent the gate                
          structures, word lines, buried contact area, and substrate; and             
               a removable spacer layer deposited over the insulator layer            
          substantially filling the first gap, partially filling the second           
          gap, and defining a sublithographic dimension between removable             
          spacer walls formed over the buried contact area, the removable             
          spacer walls being formed by the removable spacer layer adjacent            
          the plurality of gate structures, wherein the removable spacer              
          layer provides an enhanced etching selectivity in relation to the           
          insulator layer and is adapted to be completely removed when                
          isotropically etched.                                                       
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Cathey et al. (Cathey)           5,069,747           Dec. 3, 1991           
          Kobayashi                        5,422,315           Jun. 6, 1995           
                                    THE REJECTION                                     
               Claims 1-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being              
          unpatentable over Kobayashi in view of Cathey.                              





                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007