Ex Parte TOLMAN - Page 7




          Appeal No. 2003-1573                                                        
          Application No. 08/854,407                                                  


          page 9, line 2), with no finding that these alloys were useful in           
          bias layers in an MR sensor.  Matsushita only discloses these               
          nitrided alloys used as “a core material for a VTR head”                    
          (translation, page 5, last paragraph).  Accordingly, we determine           
          that the examiner has failed to show any specific motivation or             
          reasoning that one of ordinary skill in this art would have used            
          the nitrided Sendust alloy of Matsushita as a substitute for the            
          bias layer of Bonyhard.                                                     
               For the foregoing reasons and those set forth in the Brief, we         
          determine that the examiner has not established a prima facie case          
          of obviousness in view of the reference evidence.  Accordingly, we          
          cannot sustain the rejection on appeal.                                     

















                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007