Ex Parte JUSTEL et al - Page 6




          Appeal No. 2003-1932                                       Page 6           
          Application No. 09/436,179                                                  


          non-increased pH value below the alkaline magnesium hydroxide               
          formation range for the suspension solution prior to the pH                 
          increasing step.  In so doing, we agree with the examiner that              
          one of ordinary skill in the art would have been led to a non-              
          alkaline, non-hydroxide forming neutral pH value, such as about             
          7, as being appropriate for the suspension prior to the pH                  
          raising step.                                                               
               Moreover, one of ordinary skill in the art would have                  
          reasonably arrived at a suitable increased alkaline pH, such as             
          the here claimed pH of about 9.5, for causing the formation of              
          the magnesium hydroxide.  As pointed out by the examiner, Bruno             
          teaches that the conversion of a metal chelate compound, such as            
          magnesium chloride, to the hydroxide occurs at a pH of greater              
          than about 9.  See column 9, line 40 through column 10, line 56             
          of Bruno.  Consequently, we agree with the examiner that the here           
          claimed process is rendered prima facie obvious based on the                
          combined teachings of Bruno and Tamatani.1                                  



               1 While the examiner refers to four other references at                
          pages 5 and 6 of the answer, we observe that those other                    
          references are not identified as evidence being relied upon in              
          the rejection before us.  Consequently, we do not take the                  
          teachings of those other references into account in assessing the           
          propriety of the examiner’s obviousness position.                           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007