Appeal No. 2003-1937 Application No. 09/522,296 disclosure is found in column 5, lines 17-25, regarding the embodiment of Figure 3 in the Take patent. In the reply brief, appellants further contend that the combinations posited by the examiner are the result of hindsight reconstruction based on appellants' own disclosure and not on any disclosure or suggestion of the desirability of making such changes in the club head structure of Mockridge found in the applied references themselves.2 Having considered the applied patents to Mockridge, Take, Helmstetter and Drajan, we share appellants' view that there is no motivation, teaching or suggestion in the applied references, whether considered individually or collectively, for the examiner's proposed combinations thereof. In our opinion, appellants have correctly assessed the teachings of Take, and correctly concluded that this patent teaches away from a club head construction like that claimed by appellants. We also agree with appellants that the examiner has used impermissible hindsight derived from appellants' own teachings in seeking to 2 We have understood appellants' many references to "Drajan '033" in the brief and reply brief as being to Drajan '318, the reference applied by the examiner in the rejections on appeal. 77Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007