The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 15 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte CYPRIAN EMEKA UZOH and HOMAYOUN TALIEH __________ Appeal No. 2003-1980 Application No. 09/351,868 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before OWENS, WALTZ, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges. MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1-3, 5-9, 11-20, 49-52, 66, 67, 71-80, 85, and 86. Claims 21-37, 55-62, and 64 are allowed. Claims 4, 10, 53, 54, 68-70, and 81-84 are objected to. Claims 38-48, 63, and 65 have been canceled. Thus, only claims 1-3, 5-9, 11-20, 49-52, 66, 67, 71-80, 85, and 86 are before us on this appeal.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007