Ex Parte GARDNER et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-2079                                                        
          Application No. 09/207,972                                                  

               According to appellants, the invention is directed to a                
          semiconductor device with a graded-K gate dielectric, including a           
          low-trap-density nitrogen-containing oxide layer, with a gate               
          conductor above the dielectric material, to yield favorable                 
          interface properties between the dielectric and the semiconductor           
          substrate (Brief, page 3).  Illustrative independent claim 16 is            
          reproduced below:                                                           
               16.  A semiconductor device, comprising:                               
               a low-trap-density nitrogen-containing oxide arranged upon an          
                    upper surface of a semiconductor substrate;                       
               a high-K dielectric having a dielectric constant greater than          
                    about 5 arranged upon the nitrogen-containing oxide; and          
               a gate conductor arranged above the high-K dielectric.                 
               The examiner relies upon the following references as evidence          
          of obviousness:                                                             
          Wu                              5,880,508          Mar. 09, 1999            
          Chou                            5,994,734          Nov. 30, 1999            
          Kizilyalli et al.               6,320,238 B1       Nov. 20, 2001            
          (Kizilyalli ‘238, filed Jun. 25, 1999; continuation-in-part of              
          application No. 08/995,435 (Kizilyalli ‘435 application), filed on          
          Dec. 22, 1997; provisional application No. 60/033,839, filed on             
          Dec. 23, 1996)                                                              
               Claims 16-19, 21, 23, 30 and 31 stand rejected under                   
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Kizilyalli ‘238 in view             
          of Wu (Answer, page 4).  Claim 20 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C.           

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007