Interference No. 103,675
CHEN ET AL. MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS
Chen et al.'s first motion to suppress seeks to exclude
various parts of Bouchard et al.'s record and various Bouchard et al.
exhibits. All the materials sought to be suppressed relate to Bouchard
et al.'s various motions which have either been dismissed or denied
above in our decision on the parties' motions briefs. Accordingly,
Chen et al.'s first motion to suppress is DISMISSED as moot.
Similarly, Chen et al.'s second motion to suppress seeks to
exclude evidence relevant to motions brought by Bouchard et al.
pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.655(a). Because we have, above, denied
Bouchard et al.'s motions under § 1.655(a), Chen et al.'s request is
DISMISSED as moot.
BOUCHARD ET AL. MOTION TO SUPPRESS
Bouchard et al. filed a motion to suppress (Paper Number
290) and a belated, supplemental motion to suppress (Paper
Number 291). According to Bouchard et al., their supplemental motion
to suppress was filed for the purpose of complying with the APJ's
interlocutory order of April 25, 2000, which was "overlooked" by
Bouchard et al. when they filed their motion to suppress. According to
Bouchard et al., Chen et al. will not be prejudiced by the belated
supplemental motion to suppress because it is strictly procedural in
nature and does not seek to suppress any additional evidence beyond
54
Page: Previous 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007