Interference No. 103,675
And, it falls squarely within either the "business records"
or "catchall" exceptions to the hearsay rule, Fed. R.
Evid.803(6) and (24) and is therefore admissible.
By invoking the hearsay exceptions of the Federal Rules, Chen et al.
have implicitly conceded that the documentary materials and testimony
concerning said documentary materials sought to be excluded are
hearsay under Federal Rule 802. Accordingly, the narrow issue for us
to decide is whether or not Chen et al. have established that the
documentary evidence falls within one of the hearsay exceptions set
forth in the rules.
In order to come within the exception under Federal Rule
803(6), Chen et al. were required to prove, in the words of the rule,
61
Page: Previous 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007