Interference No. 103,675
A. Yes.
Q. What's the date?
A. The date is May 1, 1992.
Q. Now, did you review that spectra at the time it was
obtained back in May of 1992?
A. Yes. (CR 1771)
But, as an inventor, Dr. Chen's testimony requires corroboration10 and
there is no corroboration of Dr. Chen's testimony by any non-inventor.
Additionally, except for CX 326, the testimony lacks adequate
specificity to establish the existence of any of the other materials
sought to be excluded. We find Dr. Chen's terse testimony to be
10Holmwood v. Sugavanam, 948 F.2d 1236, 1239, 20 USPQ2d 1712,
1715 (Fed. Cir. 1991).
65
Page: Previous 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007