ROSE V. WERTZ et al. - Page 8




                             (2) The following claims are designated as corresponding to Count 2:                                   
                                     Wertz: 1, 5, 6, and 10                                                                         
                                     Rose: 75-99 and 101-132;                                                                       
                             FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on priority is awarded against GAIL W.                                   
              WERTZ, QINGZHONG YU, LAURENCE A. BALL, JOHN N. BARR, AND SEAN P.J.                                                    
              WHELAN as to Count 2;                                                                                                 
                             FURTHER ORDERED that GAIL W. WERTZ, QINGZHONG YU,                                                      
              LAURENCE A. BALL, JOHN N. BARR, AND SEAN P.J. WHELAN is not entitled to a patent                                      

              containing claims 1, 5, 6, and 10 of patent 5,789,229 that correspond to Count 2;                                     
                             FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of the terminal disclaimer filed by Rose                                   
              (Paper 33) shall be given a paper number and entered in Rose's 08/435,032 application;                                

                              FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of the amendment filed by Rose canceling                                  
              claim 100 (Paper 34) shall be given a paper number and entered in Rose's 08/435,032                                   
              application;                                                                                                          

                             FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this decision shall be given a paper                                    
              number and entered in the administrative records of Wertz's 5,789,220 patent and Rose's                               

              08/435,032 application; and                                                                                           

                             FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement in the                                         
              interference, the parties are directed to 35 USC § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.666.                                         






                                                                8                                                                   







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007