NICHOLS et al. V. TABAKOFF et al. - Page 14






               Interference No. 104,522 PapeF108                                                                                                 
               Nichols v. Tabakoff Page 14                                                                                                       

               17. Notebook Ex 2030 is a two page document that has no notebook identifying                                                      

               number, is improperly dated (year missing), is not signed and is not witnessed.'                                                  

               18. Approximately two-thirds down page 94A-64, Ex 2030 reads "4/28 - NMR; not                                                     

               pure - see too many aromatic carbons - but looks like product is there" (original                                                 

               emphasis).                                                                                                                        

               19. NMR scan Ex 2031 contains the following printout: "94A-64-11; 13C.APY."                                                       

               20. Ex 2031 has not been authenticated. Neither the test procedure nor the test                                                   

               result shown by the spectral data has been explained.                                                                             

               21. At his deposition, Dr. Nichols backpedaled from his position that Ex 2031                                                     

               indicated successful production of the theoretically expected product, i.e.,                                                      

                        A. No, I didn't run the NMR, no.                                                                                         
                        Q. Okay. Do you understand what it shows?                                                                                
                        A. To some degree. Ed helped me interpret it, but I was able to see the ethyl                                            
                        peaks. And that showed that at least the diethylamine had been coupled to the                                            
                        quinoline.                                                                                                               
                        Q. But you couldn't tell where the coupling took place; right?                                                           
                        A. There was only one place that it could occur.                                                                         
                        Q. But you couldn't tell that from the spectrum?                                                                         
                        A. You can't tell that from any NIVIR spectra unless you go into much more                                               
                        sophisticated NIVIR spectroscopy.                                                                                        
                        [NR, p. 85,1. 16 - p. 86,1. 9.1                                                                                          

               22. Several handwritten notations also appear on Ex 2031, including "have 2 things                                                

               at least"and 11 quats need only 6."                                                                                               

               23. During cross-examination, Dr. Nichols further testified:                                                                      

                        Q. ...      there's a handwritten note: Have 11 things at least. Do you see that?                                        


                        5 To the extent that one or more of Exs 2017-2022, 2024, 2030, 2032, 2041-2047, 2049, 2052                               
               and 2072 do not have a laboratory notebook identifying number on each page thereof, we note that Dr.                              
               Nichols brought his laboratory notebooks to his November 20, 2001 deposition, thereby affording Tabakoff                          
               the opportunity to examine the original notebooks for identifying numbers (NR, p. 49, 1. 21 - p. 50,1. 6).                        








Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007