BoxInterferences@uspto.gov Paper108 703-308-9-797 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO (5,747,332, 6,066,71:6, and 6,433,141), Junior Party, V. FORDHAM UNIVERSITY (09/090ý1,754), Senior Party. Interference No. 104,761 Before SCHAFER, TORCZON, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON RECONSIDERATION and JUDGMENT (PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.658) INTRODUCTION Following a decision on motions (Paper 98), the University of New Mexico [UNMI was placed under an orderto show cause (Paper 99)why judgment should not be entered against UNM. The order to show cause noted that UNM, as junior party, failed to overcome Fordham's effective filing date. In the decision on motions, UNM's attack on Fordham's effective filing date also failed. The order to show cause also noted a pending Fordham motion to add another UNM patent to the interferenoe. In response, both parties have requested reconsideration of the decision on motions, UNM has responded to the order to show cause, and UNM has opposedPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007