WALLEN et al. V. WALLEN et al. V. SRIVASTAVA - Page 10

                                                                           0                                          



              Interference No. 104,761 Paper108                                                                       
              Univ. of New Mexico v. Fordharn Univ. Page 10                                                           
              UNM's response to the order to show cause, and upon reconsideration of our decision                     
              on motions, it is:                                                                                      
                     ORDERED that relief from the decision denying UNM Preliminary Motion 2 be                        
              DENIED;                                                                                                 
                     FURTHER ORDERED that relief from the decision denying Fordham Preliminary                        
              Motion 4 with regard to UNM 716 claims 7-12 be DENIED;                                                  
                     FURTHER ORDERED that the UNM opposition to Fordham's request for                                 
              reconsideration be STRUCK from the record;                                                              
                     FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 is awarded against                       
              UNM;                                                                                                    
                     FURTHER ORDERED that UNM is not entitled to a patent containing claims 1,                        
              3-5, and 7-12 of UNM's 5,747,332 patent, which correspond to Count 1;                                   
                     FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 3 is awarded against                       
              UNM;                                                                                                    
                     FURTHER ORDERED that UNM is not entitled to a patent containing claims 13                        
              30 of UNM's 6,066,716 patent or claims 1-18 of UNM's 6,433,141 patent, which                            
              correspond to Count 3;                                                                                  
                     FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 4 is awarded against                       
              UNM;                                                                                                    
                     FURTHER ORDERED that UNM is not entitled to a patent containing claims 13,                       
              15-17, and 19-23 of UNM's 5,747,332 patent, which correspond to Count 4; and                            









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007