WALLEN et al. V. WALLEN et al. V. SRIVASTAVA - Page 11





              Interference No. 104,761 Papei-108                                                                      
              Univ. of New Mexico v. Fordham Univ. Page 11                                                            
                     FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this decision be entered in the                                   
              administrative record of UNM's 5,747,332 patent, 6,066,716 patent and 6,433,141                         
              patent, and of Fordham's 09/090,754 application.                                                        

                                              RICHARD E. SCHAFER BOARD OF                                             
                                              Administrative Patent Judge PATENT                                      
                                              RICHARD TORCZON APPEALS AND                                             
                                              Administrative Patent Judge INTERFERENCES                               
                                              CAROL A. SPIEGEL INTERFERENCE                                           
                                              Administrative Patent Judge TRIAL SECTION                               

              cc (electronic mail):                                                                                   
              Paul Adams and Deborah Peacock of PEACOCK, MYERS & ADAMS P.C. for the                                   
              University of New Mexico, and                                                                           
              Samuel B. Abrams and Michael J. Ryan of PENNIE & EDMONDS LLP for Fordham                                
              University (Antigenics, Inc., licensee).                                                                



















              Notice: Any agreement or understanding between parties to this interference, including any collateral   
              agreements referred to therein, made in connection with or in contemplation of the termination of the   
              interference, shall be in writing and a true copy thereof filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office
              before termination of the interference as between said parties to the agreement or understanding. 35 U.S.C.
              135(c); 37 C.F.R. § 1.661.                                                                              



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007