The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 62 Filed by: Interference Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Filed: Washington, D.C. 20231 31 March 2003 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFI E MAILED BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS MAR 3 1 2003 AND INTERFERENCES PAT & TIVI. OFFICE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERE mi ARNOLD C. BILSTAD, BRADLEY H. BUCHANAN, ALAN W. MARTILLA and ARCHIE WOODWORTH Junior Party, (Application 09/294,964), V. GEORGE WAKALOPULOS and EDUARDO R. URGILES Senior Party (Patent 6,140,657). Patent Interference No. 104,832 Before: SCHAFER, TORCZON and NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judyes. SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON WAKALOPULOS PRELIMINARY MOTION I AND FINAL JUDGMENT Wakalopulos filed a preliminary motion asserting that all of Bilstad's involved claims (Claims 57-65) are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 112, T 1, for failing to be supported by a written description. Paper 21. We grant the motion. Since Bilstad's Claims 57-65 formed the sole basisPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007