The opinion in support of the decision being
enter ed today is not-binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 30
Filed by: Merits Panel
Interference Trial Section
Mail Stop Interference Filed
P. 0. Box 1450 17 June 2003
Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD-OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
ROLAND ANDREE,
MARK WILHELM nREWES, MARKUS DOLLItG11R,and HANS-JOACHIM SANTEL MIN 7LED
Junior Party JUN 2 7 2003
(Patent No. 6,251,828),
I PAT. & T.M. OFFICE
V. BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
RALF KLINTZ, PETER SCHAEFER,
GERHARD HAMPRECHT, ELISABETH HEISTRACHER,
HANS-JOSEF WOLF, KARL-OTTO WESTPHALEN,
MATTHIAS GERBER, UWE KARDORFF, HELMUT WALTER,
and KLAUS GROSSMANN
Senior Party
(Application No. 09/733,554).
Patent Interference 105,039 (NAGUMO)
Before SCHAFER, TIERNEY, and NAGUMO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON ANDREE PRELIMINARY MOTION 1 AND FINAL JUDGMENT
Introduction
This interference concerns chemical c6rnpounds, substituted
3-phenyluracils, that are said to be particularly useful as
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007