Interference 105,039 Paper No. 28 Andree v. Klintz Page 5 Count 2: 15. Count 2 in this interference is: The composition of matter according to claim 56 of Klintz, U.S. Application Serial No. 09/733,554. 16. The claims of the parties that correspond to Count 2 are: Andree: 5 Klintz: 56. 17. Count 2 relates to diazo-substituted 3-phenyluracils that are intermediates - i.e., they can be transformed - to many compounds within the genus and subgenus of compounds covered by Count 1. 18. The claims of the parties that do not correspond to Count 2 are: Andree: 1-4, 6 Klintz: 1-7, 12, 13, 15, 16, 26-30, 36, 37, 39, 40, 43-51, 53-55. 19. The claims of the parties that do not correspond to either Count 1 or Count 2, and hence that are not involved in this interference, are: Andree: none Klintz: 6, 29, 44. 20. Klintz's claims 53-56 were "copied" from Andree's claims in order to provoke this interference. (Exhibit 2005 atPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007